The North West Company successfully monopolized the
fur trade in the West for years, but not without serious
competition from the Hudson's Bay Company. As this 1798
directive from Nor'Westers William McGillivray and Alexander
Mackenzie reveals, traders and winterers were instructed
to "properly watch" the opposition so that
Indians would not trade their furs elsewhere. North
West Company traders were also prohibited from marrying
for fear that it might impede their ability to winter
for long periods. In contrast, the Hudson's Bay Company
encouraged their traders to marry Aboriginal women in
order to solidify trading alliances.
The North West Company, created in 1787 from an
amalgamation of several independent Montreal traders,
controlled the western fur trade for several years,
much to the chagrin of its great trading rival, the
Hudson's Bay Company. With a network of posts stretching
to the Pacific Ocean, the North West Company laid
the foundation for western settlements. As a company
it was a great success, accumulating wealth by exchanging
the raw materials of the West for imported and processed
goods from central Canadian centres.
Yet the daily fur trade depended most on the efforts
of the voyageurs, engagés, and winterers who
ventured west. It has been said that the western fur
trade was developed literally on the backs of the
voyageurs. These men - French Canadians, French and
English Métis, and Indians - worked long hours
for low wages, carrying goods over thousands of miles
and wintering in desolate, unfamiliar, and at times,
hostile territory. But eventually this became their
life and many of the traders put down roots, having
relationships with and often marrying Indian or Métis
women "à la façon du pays." In contrast
to the policy of the North West Company, mixed relationships
were encouraged by the Hudson's Bay Company for business
reasons. In the Hudson's Bay Company's view, not only
could these Indian and Métis women help with
the work but the familial and tribal connections they
brought with them smoothed relations between traders
and Indian groups. These "women in between"
often experienced a rise in prestige and increase
in political power and personal security because of
their attachments to European fur traders. While the
Hudson's Bay Company may have been interested only
in increasing the numbers of furs and turning better
profits, more personal considerations often dictated
the relationships between European traders and Aboriginal
women.
While the North West Company experienced great success
probing farther inland and building posts, the Hudson's
Bay Company continued to focus its efforts on inland
posts along the Red, Assiniboine and Saskatchewan
River systems. Sometimes within a few miles of each
other there would be posts belonging to the North
West Company, the Hudson's Bay Company, and an independent
(often American) trader. Interestingly, it was common
practice for the two major companies to build key
posts close together and compete for the Indians'
business. However, such duplication merely reduced
the profits of both.
The late-1700s and early-1800s were the greatest
era for the North West Company. After the explorations
of Alexander Mackenzie, Simon Fraser, and David Thompson,
the areas of present-day western Alberta and British
Columbia were gradually becoming more well-known and
the maps of river systems, lakes, and mountains more
reliable. In turn, the North West Company extended
itself farther westward, building more and more posts.
Employing over 1,500 officers, clerks, and labourers,
the North West Company developed into an efficient
organization. The company increased its profits and
dividends, often through the ruthless harvesting and
near extermination of fur-bearing animals.
In contrast, during this period the Hudson's Bay
Company suffered from an inflexible organization and
policies which were set in London, England. The many
wars between Britain and France in the 1700s also
made European markets uncertain. In 1778, the Hudson's
Bay Company paid a ten percent dividend, in 1779 eight
percent, but from 1783 to 1785 there was no dividend
at all. For almost 24 years the dividend averaged
four percent. But the company had a stable organization
and a history of experience in the fur trade. Yet
this was not enough to withstand the pressures exerted
by the North West Company and in 1821 a modus vivendi
was reached, which resulted in the amalgamation of
the two rival companies.